South Africa finds itself in a diplomatic predicament as it prepares to host the BRICS summit in Johannesburg next month, with Russian President Vladimir Putin among the invited guests. However, Putin is also the target of an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant, creating a complex situation for the country, which is an ICC member obligated to implement such warrants.
The main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA), has taken the matter to court, seeking to ensure that if Putin attends the summit, he will be arrested and handed over to the ICC. Yet, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has responded with a sense of caution, describing the DA’s application as “irresponsible” and citing national security concerns.
Ramaphosa revealed that Russia has warned that arresting a sitting President would be considered a “declaration of war,” making such a move inconsistent with South Africa’s constitution and its duty to protect the nation. The government is seeking an exemption under ICC rules, arguing that enforcing the arrest could jeopardize the “security, peace, and order of the state.”
As the current chair of the BRICS group, which also includes Brazil, Russia, India, and China, South Africa sees itself as a counterbalance to Western economic domination. However, hosting Putin amidst the ICC arrest warrant creates a delicate situation that requires careful consideration to maintain both international relations and national security.
The ICC’s interest in Putin is related to accusations of Russia unlawfully deporting Ukrainian children. Despite South Africa’s attempts to persuade Putin not to attend the summit, he remains on the guest list, leaving the country grappling with a diplomatic dilemma.
A recently published affidavit signed by Ramaphosa reveals the government’s concerns and the sensitive nature of the issue, as it strives to navigate the conflicting demands of international law and its role as host of the BRICS summit.
