In a bid to address the escalating tensions between Edo State’s top leadership, Deputy Governor Philip Shaibu has taken a legal step by filing a motion in the Federal High Court in Abuja. The motion seeks to secure an order of interlocutory injunction, aimed at protecting Shaibu from any form of harassment, intimidation, embarrassment, or obstruction in the execution of his official duties by his superior, Governor Godwin Obaseki.
The move comes amidst reports and speculations that Governor Obaseki is contemplating the impeachment of his deputy. The strained relationship between the two leaders has been on public display, particularly since the emergence of a viral video featuring Shaibu alongside Senator Adams Oshiomhole, a former governor of Edo State and a known political adversary of Obaseki.
The contentious Abuja video seemed to ignite a sequence of events that have deepened the divide between the governor and his deputy. Allegedly responding to the video, Governor Obaseki orchestrated a private gathering at his residence, specifically inviting members of the Edo State House of Assembly from the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). Notably, this gathering conspicuously excluded Deputy Governor Shaibu.
Upon learning of the exclusive meeting, Shaibu made his way to the Governor’s residence, only to be met with refusal and informed that he was not among the invitees. This incident further strained their relationship, highlighting the growing schism between the two officials.
Governor Obaseki’s accusations of disloyalty against his deputy have fueled the rift, intensifying the already tense political climate in Edo State. The threat of removing Shaibu from his position adds another layer of uncertainty to the situation, as the dynamics between the two leaders continue to evolve.
The decision to seek legal protection through the Federal High Court underscores the seriousness of the ongoing feud and its potential impact on governance and stability within Edo State. As the legal process unfolds, the public will be keenly observing the outcome, which could have significant implications for the state’s political landscape and the functioning of its leadership.
The situation highlights the complexities of political power struggles and the delicate balance required for effective governance. It also serves as a reminder of the importance of institutional mechanisms for conflict resolution and the rule of law in ensuring the stability and functionality of democratic systems.
